• POST WITH YOUR REAL NAME (FIRST & LAST!)
• POST WITH YOUR REAL EMAIL ADDRESS
• NO FLAMES
• NO ADS
• NO TROLLING
• PLEASE KEEP BAD LANGUAGE TO A MINIMUM

GOHEAVY.COM Olympic Weightlifting Forum

Re: Moser Clean & Jerk Case Study

Posted By: Robert Cotrell (c-76-17-126-86.hsd1.ga.comcast.net)
Date: Wednesday, December 6, 2006, @ 6:28 p.m.

In Response To: Re: Moser Clean & Jerk Case Study (Marty Schnorf)

I do agree rules are rules. I guess I just dont see the point of this particular rule . Our sport is weightlifting , not Weightdropping? Iam not as active as most of you guys. I do try to recruite any body slightly interested in the sport. It is my favorite sport. I do what I can.

Messages In This Thread

• Moser Clean & Jerk Case Study *LINK*
  Tracy Fober (209-145-160-58.accessus.net) -- Tuesday, December 5, 2006, @ 1:22 p.m.
  • Re: Moser Clean & Jerk Case Study
    VIC DAVY (68-169-57-20.ashbva.adelphia.net) -- Tuesday, December 5, 2006, @ 2:37 p.m.
    • Re: Moser Clean & Jerk Case Study
      Jason Brown (cpe-24-242-117-55.sport.res.rr.com) -- Tuesday, December 5, 2006, @ 3:06 p.m.
      • Re: Moser Clean & Jerk Case Study
        John Raffaele (100-37.73-24.tampabay.res.rr.com) -- Tuesday, December 5, 2006, @ 7:03 p.m.
        • because they're rule cheaters & drug cheaters??
          Steven Zeigman (249-197.127-70.tampabay.res.rr.com) -- Tuesday, December 5, 2006, @ 7:52 p.m.
      • Re: Moser Clean & Jerk Case Study
        Marty Schnorf (12-207-142-188.client.mchsi.com) -- Tuesday, December 5, 2006, @ 8:25 p.m.
        • Re: Moser Clean & Jerk Case Study *LINK*
          Butch Curry (c-69-181-57-150.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) -- Wednesday, December 6, 2006, @ 2:51 a.m.
          • Re: Moser Clean & Jerk Case Study
            Robert Cotrell (c-76-17-126-86.hsd1.ga.comcast.net) -- Wednesday, December 6, 2006, @ 5:52 p.m.
            • Re: Moser Clean & Jerk Case Study
              Marty Schnorf (12-207-142-188.client.mchsi.com) -- Wednesday, December 6, 2006, @ 6:06 p.m.
              • Re: Moser Clean & Jerk Case Study
                Robert Cotrell (c-76-17-126-86.hsd1.ga.comcast.net) -- Wednesday, December 6, 2006, @ 6:28 p.m.
                • Re: Moser Clean & Jerk Case Study
                  Marty Schnorf (12-207-142-188.client.mchsi.com) -- Wednesday, December 6, 2006, @ 7:49 p.m.
              • Re: Moser Clean & Jerk Case Study
                john raffaele (100-37.73-24.tampabay.res.rr.com) -- Wednesday, December 6, 2006, @ 8:16 p.m.
                • READ THE RULE BOOK!!
                  TIM SWORDS (host250.bayer.com) -- Thursday, December 7, 2006, @ 5:23 a.m.
                • "Interpetation of the rules...."
                  Nicholas Curry (c-69-249-95-10.hsd1.nj.comcast.net) -- Thursday, December 7, 2006, @ 6:18 a.m.
                  • Re: "Interpetation of the rules...."
                    mark cohen / liberty (pool-68-239-251-226.nwrk.east.verizon.net) -- Thursday, December 7, 2006, @ 3:54 p.m.
    • Officials? should show us how it's done!
      Steven Zeigman (249-197.127-70.tampabay.res.rr.com) -- Tuesday, December 5, 2006, @ 3:47 p.m.
  • Should have been 3 red lights, not just 2 *PIC*
    Lincoln Brigham (cm-24-121-23-70.sedona.az.npgco.com) -- Tuesday, December 5, 2006, @ 3:35 p.m.
    • He sure did drop it...just like Kendrick!!! *NM*
      Steven Zeigman (249-197.127-70.tampabay.res.rr.com) -- Tuesday, December 5, 2006, @ 3:41 p.m.
      • ...and Yogi tagged out Jackie Robinson at home *PIC*
        Lincoln Brigham (cm-24-121-23-70.sedona.az.npgco.com) -- Tuesday, December 5, 2006, @ 4:01 p.m.
        • Re: NOT ALLOWED TO THROW THE BAR DOWN *NM*
          Steven Zeigman (249-197.127-70.tampabay.res.rr.com) -- Tuesday, December 5, 2006, @ 6:07 p.m.
          • Re: NOT ALLOWED TO THROW THE BAR DOWN
            JackDluzen (70.44.79.252.res-cmts.brd2.ptd.net) -- Tuesday, December 5, 2006, @ 6:18 p.m.
            • YEP.& THE OL PRESS OUT WAS A SUCCESSFUL LIFT! *NM*
              Steven Zeigman (249-197.127-70.tampabay.res.rr.com) -- Tuesday, December 5, 2006, @ 7:49 p.m.
    • Re: Should have been 3 red lights, not just 2
      Greg Everett (64.149.121.34) -- Tuesday, December 5, 2006, @ 5:19 p.m.
      • Re: Should have been 3 red lights, not just 2
        Jim Storch (cpe-74-67-92-193.stny.res.rr.com) -- Tuesday, December 5, 2006, @ 5:40 p.m.
      • Re: Should have been 3 red lights, not just 2
        Paul LeDrew (S0106000f20296b0d.ed.shawcable.net) -- Wednesday, December 6, 2006, @ 7:13 a.m.
        • (Message Deleted by Poster)
          Jordan Devaty (adsl-69-151-249-26.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net) -- Wednesday, December 6, 2006, @ 11:03 a.m.
          • Re: Should have been 3 red lights, not just 2
            Paul LeDrew (S0106000f20296b0d.ed.shawcable.net) -- Wednesday, December 6, 2006, @ 7:45 p.m.
        • I am a Irish AMERICAN!!!!!!!!!
          TIM SWORDS (host250.bayer.com) -- Wednesday, December 6, 2006, @ 12:06 p.m.
          • I'm an Aggie-American...
            Bull Ternus (71-210-199-225.albq.qwest.net) -- Wednesday, December 6, 2006, @ 5:24 p.m.
            • Re: I'm an Aggie-American...
              TIM SWORDS (cpe-24-174-34-121.houston.res.rr.com) -- Wednesday, December 6, 2006, @ 7:26 p.m.
        • Re: Should have been 3 red lights, not just 2
          James Moser (cpe-24-242-119-49.sport.res.rr.com) -- Wednesday, December 6, 2006, @ 12:35 p.m.
          • Re: Should have been 3 red lights, not just 2
            terry grow (adsl-75-36-111-37.dsl.bcvloh.sbcglobal.net) -- Wednesday, December 6, 2006, @ 1:40 p.m.
            • Re: Should have been 3 red lights, not just 2
              James Moser (cpe-24-242-119-49.sport.res.rr.com) -- Wednesday, December 6, 2006, @ 2:13 p.m.
          • Re: Should have been 3 red lights, not just 2 *LINK*
            Tracy Fober (209-145-160-58.accessus.net) -- Wednesday, December 6, 2006, @ 5:39 p.m.