GOHEAVY.COM Forums
We have made several changes to our policy here at GOHEAVY. Here they are:
  • POST WITH YOUR REAL NAME (FIRST & LAST!)
  • POST WITH YOUR REAL EMAIL ADDRESS
  • NO FLAMES
  • NO ADS
  • NO TROLLING
  • PLEASE KEEP BAD LANGUAGE TO A MINIMUM
The moderators of this forum reserve the right to delete any post that is deemed inappropriate for this forum.

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

GOHEAVY.COM Debates Forum

Re: of course there's yearly variation

Posted By: Simon Weaver (203-184-60-125.jetbuster.co.nz)
Date: Tuesday, March 11, 2008, @ 1:46 a.m.

In Response To: of course there's yearly variation (Scott Slaterly)

I'm at odds in what the issue is here. Surely being more efficient in our energy use and lowering carbon emissions nearer to carbon neutral must be good for the planet and surely increased carbon dioxide emissions caused largely by man must be detrimental. Even if the data is wrong, which nearly every scientist in the world in this field would disagree with, what potentially is wrong with more efficient use of resources? Especially considering in the next 20 years a much larger percentage the world will be consuming at a much greater rate (with the growth of China and India).

Put it this way, if 100 doctors told me my child needed this drug or they would die and 1 doctor said don't do anything I think I know who I would follow. I just can't see this great opposition to the issue of increased CO2 production (or global warming if you like)from persons with no background knowledge in the field other than some polititians lobbying.

Password:

Messages In This Thread

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

GOHEAVY.COM Debates Forum is maintained by Administrator with WebBBS 5.12.