We have made several changes to our policy here at GOHEAVY. Here they are:
POST WITH YOUR REAL NAME (FIRST & LAST!)
POST WITH YOUR REAL EMAIL ADDRESS
NO FLAMES
NO ADS
NO TROLLING
PLEASE KEEP BAD LANGUAGE TO A MINIMUM
The moderators of this forum reserve the right to delete any post that is deemed inappropriate for this forum.
GOHEAVY.COM Debates Forum
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt !
Posted By: J. Greenwood (c-67-177-23-122.hsd1.ut.comcast.net)
Date: Wednesday, January 30, 2008, @ 10:09 a.m.
In Response To: Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! (willie williams)
I never dogged on geared lifting. But if we're going to revisit this I think what is really happening is geared lifters (you) try to pass off a superior gearless bench (500lbs) as common to make their geared lifts look more impressive. Some people are impressed with the geared shit some aren't. I'm usually mute on the subject. But if you're going to say that 500 is common we have to define "common." If you think 500 people (at the most) total in the USA is common then I guess we can agree. I doubt you have benched 500 gearless 1000's of times. I know you don't care if anyone believes you or not but it just illustrates the trend for those who bench a lot in a shirt to lay claim to something large gearless. In itself that's not a big deal but to say how easy it is without ever being willing to prove it is pretty gay. My suggestion for those that hate criticism is to just shut their f@ckin' mouths about what they can do gearless if they honestly don't give a shit about gearless.
Messages In This Thread
A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! willie williams (ip148254.wvlc.pat.wvnet.edu) -- Monday, January 14, 2008, @ 12:26 p.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! "King" William lee (cpe-70-114-17-74.satx.res.rr.com) -- Monday, January 14, 2008, @ 5:08 p.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! p davi (adsl-64-167-63-201.dsl.mtry01.pacbell.net) -- Wednesday, January 16, 2008, @ 12:50 p.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! J. Greenwood (c-67-177-23-122.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) -- Thursday, January 17, 2008, @ 9:22 a.m.
1 out of 5000 *LINK* Steve Denison (c-67-182-83-16.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) -- Thursday, January 17, 2008, @ 10:50 p.m.
Re: 1 out of 5000 "King" William lee (cpe-70-114-17-74.satx.res.rr.com) -- Friday, January 18, 2008, @ 2:33 a.m.
Re: 1 out of 5000 Arthur "Superman" Jones (ip24-251-103-76.ph.ph.cox.net) -- Friday, January 18, 2008, @ 7:41 a.m.
Re: 1 out of 5000 *LINK* Steve Denison (c-67-182-83-16.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) -- Friday, January 18, 2008, @ 7:53 a.m.
Re: 1 out of 5000 Arthur "Superman" Jones (ip24-251-103-76.ph.ph.cox.net) -- Friday, January 18, 2008, @ 9:48 a.m.
Re: 1 out of 5000 Steven Green (host-204-114-53-254.co.sanmateo.ca.us) -- Friday, January 18, 2008, @ 10:27 a.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! willie williams (ip148254.wvlc.pat.wvnet.edu) -- Friday, January 18, 2008, @ 7:42 a.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! J. Greenwood (c-67-177-23-122.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) -- Friday, January 18, 2008, @ 12:14 p.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! willie williams (ip148254.wvlc.pat.wvnet.edu) -- Saturday, January 19, 2008, @ 8:32 a.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! Jim Ray (75-130-28-173.dhcp.mdsn.wi.charter.com) -- Saturday, January 19, 2008, @ 9:15 a.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! J. Greenwood (c-67-177-23-122.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) -- Saturday, January 19, 2008, @ 11:54 a.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! Jamie Emberley (bas3-kitchener06-1096650181.dsl.bell.ca) -- Saturday, January 19, 2008, @ 4:53 p.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! willie williams (ip148254.wvlc.pat.wvnet.edu) -- Sunday, January 20, 2008, @ 11:28 a.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! J. Greenwood (c-67-177-23-122.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) -- Sunday, January 20, 2008, @ 3:30 p.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! willie williams (ip148254.wvlc.pat.wvnet.edu) -- Monday, January 21, 2008, @ 7:58 a.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! J. Greenwood (c-67-177-23-122.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) -- Monday, January 21, 2008, @ 10:49 a.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! willie williams (ip148254.wvlc.pat.wvnet.edu) -- Monday, January 21, 2008, @ 5:39 p.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! J. Greenwood (c-67-177-23-122.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) -- Monday, January 21, 2008, @ 8:32 p.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! willie williams (ip148254.wvlc.pat.wvnet.edu) -- Wednesday, January 23, 2008, @ 7:59 a.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! J. Greenwood (c-67-177-23-122.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) -- Wednesday, January 23, 2008, @ 9:57 a.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! willie williams (ip148254.wvlc.pat.wvnet.edu) -- Friday, January 25, 2008, @ 11:32 a.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! J. Greenwood (c-67-177-23-122.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) -- Saturday, January 26, 2008, @ 4:11 a.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! willie williams (ip148254.wvlc.pat.wvnet.edu) -- Sunday, January 27, 2008, @ 11:26 a.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! J. Greenwood (c-67-177-23-122.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) -- Sunday, January 27, 2008, @ 12:07 p.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! willie williams (ip148254.wvlc.pat.wvnet.edu) -- Monday, January 28, 2008, @ 8:51 a.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! Mark Mitchell (wsip-68-98-205-101.ks.ok.cox.net) -- Monday, January 28, 2008, @ 1:24 p.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! rick knicely (71.61.112.38) -- Monday, January 28, 2008, @ 2:31 p.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! willie williams (ip148254.wvlc.pat.wvnet.edu) -- Tuesday, January 29, 2008, @ 2:05 p.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! Mark Mitchell (wsip-68-98-205-101.ks.ok.cox.net) -- Tuesday, January 29, 2008, @ 2:32 p.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! willie williams (ip148254.wvlc.pat.wvnet.edu) -- Wednesday, January 30, 2008, @ 9:11 a.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! Mark Mitchell (wsip-68-98-205-101.ks.ok.cox.net) -- Wednesday, January 30, 2008, @ 4:47 p.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! J. Greenwood (c-67-177-23-122.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) -- Wednesday, January 30, 2008, @ 10:09 a.m.
No way, WW Jim Ray (75-130-28-173.dhcp.mdsn.wi.charter.com) -- Tuesday, January 29, 2008, @ 3:50 a.m.
Re: No way, WW willie williams (ip148254.wvlc.pat.wvnet.edu) -- Tuesday, January 29, 2008, @ 1:34 p.m.
I am going to have to agree... Tim"THEPEOPLESCHAMP"Bruner (cpe-24-174-14-25.austin.res.rr.com) -- Tuesday, January 29, 2008, @ 1:57 p.m.
Re: I am going to have to agree... willie williams (ip148254.wvlc.pat.wvnet.edu) -- Tuesday, January 29, 2008, @ 2:16 p.m.
I guess I'm wrong then Jim Ray (75-130-28-173.dhcp.mdsn.wi.charter.com) -- Tuesday, January 29, 2008, @ 5:21 p.m.
The dead guy JoeDalton (208-110-205-6.twcbs.com) -- Wednesday, January 30, 2008, @ 5:28 a.m.
Re: I guess I'm wrong then willie williams (ip148254.wvlc.pat.wvnet.edu) -- Wednesday, January 30, 2008, @ 8:59 a.m.
Re: I am going to have to agree... J. Greenwood (c-67-177-23-122.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) -- Wednesday, January 30, 2008, @ 5:54 p.m.
No A-hole......... Tim"THEPEOPLESCHAMP"Bruner (cpe-24-174-14-25.austin.res.rr.com) -- Wednesday, January 30, 2008, @ 8:20 p.m.
Re: No A-hole......... Andrew Hart (cache-ntc-ab01.proxy.aol.com) -- Thursday, January 31, 2008, @ 12:07 a.m.
F@ck who? j. Greenwood (c-67-177-23-122.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) -- Thursday, January 31, 2008, @ 9:59 a.m.
Re: F@ck who? willie williams (ip148254.wvlc.pat.wvnet.edu) -- Friday, February 1, 2008, @ 11:50 a.m.
Re: F@ck who? j. greenwood (c-67-177-23-122.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) -- Friday, February 1, 2008, @ 1:56 p.m.
Re: F@ck who? wolf hasenmaier (p5B15EFF7.dip.t-dialin.net) -- Saturday, February 2, 2008, @ 8:53 a.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! william gregg (pool-71-174-18-195.bstnma.east.verizon.net) -- Friday, January 18, 2008, @ 6:31 p.m.
Re: 500+ raw benches Myles Kantor (adsl-065-013-064-094.sip.bct.bellsouth.net) -- Friday, January 18, 2008, @ 9:11 p.m.
Re: 500+ raw benches willie williams (ip148254.wvlc.pat.wvnet.edu) -- Saturday, January 19, 2008, @ 8:23 a.m.
Re: 500+ raw benches J. Greenwood (c-67-177-23-122.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) -- Friday, January 18, 2008, @ 10:06 p.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! william gregg (pool-71-174-18-195.bstnma.east.verizon.net) -- Friday, January 18, 2008, @ 6:35 p.m.
Re: A lift is impressive, or it isnt ! RONNIE (cpe-24-93-99-55.columbus.res.rr.com) -- Friday, January 25, 2008, @ 1:49 a.m.
GOHEAVY.COM Debates Forum is maintained by Administrator with WebBBS 5.12 .